Category Archives: Sale of Goods

David Jones Ltd v Willis [1934] HCA 47 | 17 October 1934

ON 17 OCTOBER 1934, the High Court of Australia delivered David Jones Ltd v Willis [1934] HCA 47; (1934) 52 CLR 110 (17 October 1934).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1934/47.html

Per Rich J at 118-9:

“..whenever the description of the goods enters into the transaction so that the buyer must be taken to rely upon it to a substantial degree as well as upon the identity of the goods, it is a sale by description. Therefore, if the description is a matter that influenced the buyer and had a material bearing on the decision to buy, even if it was not the only matter that influenced the buyer, then the sale is one by description.”

Goods which only have one specific use are not of merchantable quality if they are not fit for their purpose.

Lawyers

1300 00 2088

Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd [1972] 2 WLR 1051

Ashington Piggeries v Christopher Hill Ltd [1971] 2 WLR 1051; [1972] AC 441 (24 February 1971)

Click to access Ashington%20Piggeries.pdf

Lawyers 1300 00 2088

David Jones Ltd v Willis [1934] HCA 47

ON 17 OCTOBER 1934, the High Court of Australia delivered David Jones Ltd v Willis [1934] HCA 47; (1934) 52 CLR 110 (17 October 1934).

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1934/47.html

Per Rich J at 118-9:

“..whenever the description of the goods enters into the transaction so that the buyer must be taken to rely upon it to a substantial degree as well as upon the identity of the goods, it is a sale by description. Therefore, if the description is a matter that influenced the buyer and had a material bearing on the decision to buy, even if it was not the only matter that influenced the buyer, then the sale is one by description.”

Goods which only have one specific use are not of merchantable quality if they are not fit for their purpose.

Lawyers

1300 00 2088